Sunday, January 31, 2010

Perfection

“Be perfect as your heavenly father is perfect” Jesus

“Aim for perfection” – Paul the Apostle

“…he said to me, ‘My grace is sufficient for you’” – Paul the Apostle

“For if you are able to bear the entire yoke of the Lord, you will be perfect; but if you are not able, then at least do what you can” The Didache [6:2]

“Perfection never was a requirement, although some might say we desired it.” Five Iron Frenzy

Growing up a Christian in a fairly conservative Protestant church I was given mixed signals. Some Christians, despite claiming a belief in Grace, seem to expect nothing less than perfection. Perhaps I felt this pressure more as a pastor’s kid, but I think that all kids in church feel like they are under the microscope from parents and elders. Grace, grace, grace is taught and preached, but the weight of high behavioral expectations grow with your age. Some church kids rebel from the start, enjoying every sin they can. Some hold out for some time, trying to live up to the expectations and feeling guilt for every time they slip up, and all the while trying to keep up appearances. In some groups this leads to a cult of perfection. What I witnessed was the complete depletion of my age group as we moved towards high school graduation. By the time I returned from college there were very few twenty-somethings in my former church at all – and I say former because I too have left.

To some, it seems, Christianity is nothing more than behavioral control, a list of impossible rules with the promise of pie in the sky. That is what I suspect drove off many former child church goers and prevents others from giving it a try. But I know there are many who have stayed interested in their faith, and still value it. I suppose I can only speak for myself, and this is true for me. But my beliefs have stayed important to me because I have come to understand the meaning of grace. When I was a child growing up in church, I heard the word “grace” a lot. But I did not truly understand grace, or at least not nearly as well as the expectation for perfection. Because when I saw people step out of line, the reaction from adults, parents and other kids was usually not modeling grace – it was typically punishment, disapproval or judgment.

Now, I am not perfect (just ask my wife, friends, family, and co-workers) and I do not claim to be perfect (though Molly would say I act like I think I am). But I spent most of my childhood and teen years, growing up a non-rebellious church kid, feeling guilty for not being perfect. And that was despite the fact that I knew in my mind that perfection was not the requirement; that any perfection is only by grace. But as I have said, it took me a while to understand the meaning of grace…

Reading the Didache, I wonder why I did not hear more lines such as the one I quoted above when I was growing up. And even as I wrote that rhetorical question I know the answer…. If you can follow the teachings of the Lord, you will be perfect. If not, do what you can. This is not a very “bright line” rule, not an easy rule to raise children by. Instead, it is much easier to tell your kids to be perfect. For I suppose if you tell your children to try to be perfect, but if they cannot, to do what they can, then they may “do what they can” into all sorts of undesirable situations: “well, I know I shouldn’t __________, but I did what I could!”

But, it is not easy to try to follow Christ’s teachings, and I am not convinced it is supposed to be a simple matter of behaving yourself. I have only stayed a Christian because I have come to understand the meaning of grace. Had I not come to understand it, and still only believed Christianity to be a list of impossible rules with the promise of pie in the sky, I perhaps would have abandoned the faith of my childhood by now. But as it turned out, I have stuck with it. And though I am not perfect (just ask my wife, family, friends and co-workers), I do what I can.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Grapes

"The oft-quoted Lyotardian maxim that postmondernity is an incredulity toward metanarrartives means that we tilt our heads skepically when someone (especially a religious leader) pronounces, 'There are two ways!' In response, we ask, 'What's she selling? Who's he been duped by? And who are you to tell me that there are only two ways!'

To our current way of being, 'There are two ways, one of life and one of death!' comes as a cold cup of water in the face. It smacks of religious inotolerance. And yet, it must be dealt with. We must face it head-on and with all seriousness." (pg. 49)

For a little bit of time now some of my friends on this very blog have been "encouraging" me to add some of my thoughts about the Didache. So, I was reading the above text and it made me think of an analogy myself and some of my friends worked through a couple of weeks ago. (You know who you are if you are reading this. :))

We started comparing our experience in the American Church to the fake, plastic, fruit bowl that sits on some dining room tables. That bowl of cheap, flismy, plastic fruit that appears to be so vibrant and so real. Eventually, we even narrowed it down, specifically, to a grape.

Imagine being around a table of people all eating grapes, only they aren't eating real grapes, they're eating the fake plastic ones. Now, what if you're only experience with grapes is with the fake plastic grapes? You have never encountered an actual real grape in your life, so your definition of a grape is based souly on your experience with this fake, cheap, plastic piece of fruit.

Then, not only are you eating this phony piece of food, but everybody at the table is trying to convince you that not only is this "grape" delicious, but it is the best piece of cusine that ever exsited. You can't help but sit there and look at these people as if they are certifiably insane. You have tasted this "grape" and not only is disgusting, it inedible! You would never want to eat another grape in your life.

What happens then when you are in a situation with people who are actually eating the real deal? You are going to automatically dismiss the grape as being fake based on your previous experiences, and you are going to be completely insulted by this new group of people who are insisiting that this grape is actually great food.

I feel like this sums up my experience in the church. People have tried to convince me for so long that the "Christianity" that gets propagated in most main stream churches is the real thing. Yet, I find it be as fake and plastic as the grape on the dinner table. There is no nourishment in the fake grape, it doesn't fill you up, or alleviate your hunger pains.

However, the real grape exsits, and I have tasted it, and it is delicious. So let me be the one to "sell" the real grape folks. It IS delicious and nourishing, and don't ever be afraid to go after the real thing, and don't be afraid to turn down the fake. Accept no substitutes! Please do not let the fake grapes disuade you from the real deal.

So, to sum it up, I feel it necessary to say this, "Jesus is real." He is tangibly real, and he wants to walk beside, heal us, and show us how to live our lives in a radical and transformitive way.

Brothers, I do not consider myself yet to have taken hold of it. But one thing I do: Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead, I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus. Phil 3:13-14

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Didache

In the Didache, as Trucker Frank points out (p. 63), the emphasis is on Orthopraxy-how you live- rather than on the orthodoxy (right thinking) that was the emphasis of later church councils and is often the sum of many sermons today...(just believe the proper things and you are "in"- don't believe all the right things and you are out!).

Does the Didache's emphasis on how to live "right" conflict with a belief in salvation by faith? It seems to me that this emphasis on orthopraxy is not for the purpose of achieving salvation. Rather, the emphasis on how to live was to foster a community among believers who believed in Jesus and to teach how they should treat others.
For what are we saved anyway? For a pleasant afterlife? Or, for a rich this-life as well? Do enough churches today teach their people how to live with one another in community, and how to treat others as we would want to be treated (and how to not treat people the way we wouldn't want to be treated)? Or, are they simply cutting the teaching off after telling them about salvation? Does the Gospel just include the Son of God who was crucified, died, buried and resurrected? Or does it also tell of the Son of God who lived among the people and told them how to live together? Is the kingdom somewhere we go when we die? Or is it a place that we are meant to inhabit while we are still alive? I have faith in my soul's eternal salvation. Now, teach me how to live until then.




Saturday, January 2, 2010

Didache first thoughts:

Didache first thoughts:
It is about how to live.
Earliest example of liturgy?
It is contemporaneous with the Gospels- it shares some important stuff- the two greatest commandments, the Lord's prayer, parts of
Jesus' sermons...

If any teacher or prophet asks for money he is a false prophet!
If any prophet teaches the truth but does not follow their own teachings, they are a false prophet!

Question: Why fast Wednesdays and Fridays instead of Mondays and Thursdays?

Friday, January 1, 2010

Two Ways

"There are two ways, one of life and one of death!
and there is a great difference between the two ways."